Empty Space in our Solar System
There is a lot of empty space in our solar
system. In a scale model where the sun
is represented by a weather balloon 1 meter in diameter sitting in the Baird
Auditorium of the Smithsonian's Museum of Natural History, Jupiter would be a
grapefruit orbiting at a distance of 500 meters, as far away as the Federal Triangle
Metro stop. The earth would be the size
of a beer nut, orbiting well outside the museum, say at the distance of
Constitution Avenue (see Table 1 for more details).
Object
|
Period
|
Scale
Mass
|
Model
Diameter
|
Orbital Size
|
Sun
|
|
1000
|
1 m
|
|
Mercury
|
88 d
|
0.0002
|
3 mm
|
40 m
|
Venus
|
224 d
|
0.0026
|
8 mm
|
70 m
|
Earth
|
365 d
|
0.0032
|
8 mm
|
100 m
|
Mars
|
687 d
|
0.0003
|
4 mm
|
150 m
|
Jupiter
|
12 yr
|
1
|
10 cm
|
500 m
|
Saturn
|
29 yr
|
0.30
|
9 cm
|
1 km
|
Uranus
|
84 yr
|
0.046
|
3 cm
|
2 km
|
Neptune
|
165 yr
|
0.054
|
3 cm
|
3 km
|
Pluto
|
249 yr
|
0.0005
|
2 mm
|
4 km
|
Table 1. Our Solar System
In contrast to our own solar system, the first
extrasolar planets were found in tight, short-period orbits. For example, 51 Pegasi was found to have a
companion similar in mass to Jupiter,but orbiting with a period of only 4 days.
In our scale model, that planet would be represented by a grapefruit
with an orbit about the same size as the stage of the Baird Auditorium. In retrospect it should not have been a
surprise that massive planets in short-period orbits were the first to be
discovered, because they are the easiest to detect with the Doppler technique
being used. This is an indirect
technique. We do not see the light
reflected (or heat emitted) by the planet itself, but instead we detect the
reflex motion that the gravitational pull of the planet induces in its parent
star. Just as the planet sweeps around
in its orbit, so the parent star must respond with a counterbalancing
motion. Of course, the amplitude of the
star's motion is much smaller and harder to detect, by the ratio of the masses. Jupiter orbits at 12 kilometers per second,
but the sun's raction is 12 meters per second, not much faster than a sprinter
can run. But, if you move Jupiter in
100 times closer, the orbital velocity must go up by a factor of 10. If you make the planet 10 times more massive
than Jupiter, this also makes the Doppler signature go up by a factor of 10.
Therefore, the first planetary companions
discovered by the Doppler technique were in very tight orbits and/or were
considerably more massive than Jupiter.
This is illustrated in Figure 3, where I have plotted the 20 planets
discovered so far using the Doppler technique, together with Jupiter and
Saturn. The vertical axis is the
semi-major axis of the planet's orbit (a measure of the size of the orbit) in
Astronomical Units (AU, the distance of the earth from the sun). At 5.2 and 9.5 AU, Jupiter and Saturn
(plotted as filled circles near the top of the figure) have considerably larger
orbits than any of the extrasolar planets.
The planets at the bottom of the diagram have such small orbits that the
periods are as short as 3 or 4 days, and the shapes of the orbits have been
circularized by tidal forces.
The horizontal axis in Figure 3 is the mass the planetary companion would
have if the orbit happens to be oriented so that we view it edge-on. The actual inclination of the orbit to the
line of sight, i, can not be
determined from Doppler measurements alone, and thus is usually unknown. If the orbit is actually tilted up to the
line of sight, then our estimate of the mass of the planet is too small by the
factor 1/sin(i).
Figure 3
In Figure 3 I have only plotted the planet candidates with minimum
masses less than 10 Jupiter masses (MJ). There are also a few companions with minimum
masses in the range between 10 MJ
and the substellar limit at about 75 MJ,
but they seem to be relatively rare. It
is almost as if the process that makes planets does not produce companions much
bigger than 10 or 20 MJ,
while the process that makes stars does not produce companions much smaller
than 75 MJ.
Contributed by: Dr. David Latham
|