Howard Van Till Howard J. Van Till is Professor Emeritus of Physics and Astronomy at Calvin College, located in Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA. After graduating from Calvin College in 1960, he earned his Ph.D. in physics from Michigan

begin with the concerns of Howard Van Till . Van Till and I have known each other since the mid 90s, and have been corresponding about the coherence of intelligent design as an intellectual project for about the last three years. Van Till's

It follows that Howard Van Till's riddle to design theorists is ill-posed. Van Till asks whether the design that design theorists claim to find in natural systems is strictly mind-like (i.e., conceptualized by a mind to accomplish a

action, Dembski says, “Van Till asks whether the design that design theorists claim to find in natural systems is strictly mind-like ... or also hand-like.... But Van Till has omitted a third option, namely, that design can also be word-like

to determine all the relevant chance hypotheses [which here, as noted above, means all relevant natural processes (hvt)]. Alternatively, we might think we know the relevant chance hypotheses, but later discover that we missed a crucial one.

| Contributed by: Dr. Howard Van Till

set aside as no longer relevant. Nonetheless , let us look at Dembski’s development of this portion of his argument for the specified complexity of the flagellum In several places in No Free Lunch , Dembski goes to considerable lengths

how one calculates the relevant probabilities to eliminate chance and infer design for such systems. Determining whether an irreducibly complex system exhibits specified complexity involves two things: showing that the system is specified and

are trying to accomplish. Howard Van Till for the last several years has been claiming that design theorists have not defined what they mean by design with sufficient clarity so that their views can be properly critiqued. And most recently

| Contributed by: Dr. Howard Van Till