For subtle discussions of a spectrum of positions on the adequacy of science to account for nature, the possibility of wider perspectives, and the historical judgments made on these questions, see for example Francisco J. <!g>Ayala, "<!g>Darwin's Devolution: Design Without Designer," in <!g>Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. <!g>Robert John Russell, William R. Stoeger and Francisco J. Ayala (Vatican City State; Berkeley, Calif.: Vatican Observatory Publications; <!g>Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 1998); <!g>Wesley J. Wildman, "Evaluating the Teleological Argument for Divine Action," in Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. Robert John Russell, William R. Stoeger and Francisco J. Ayala (Vatican City State; Berkeley, Calif.: Vatican Observatory Publications; Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 1998); <!g>Charles Birch, "Neo-Darwinism, Self-Organization, and Divine Action in Evolution," in Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. Robert John Russell, William R. Stoeger and Francisco J. Ayala (Vatican City State; Berkeley, Calif.: Vatican Observatory Publications; Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 1998); Ian G. <!g>Barbour, "Five Models of God and Evolution," in Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. Robert John Russell, William R. Stoeger and Francisco J. Ayala (Vatican City State; Berkeley, Calif.: Vatican Observatory Publications; Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 1998); Edwin A. Burtt, The <!g>Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science; a Historical and Critical Essay, Rev. ed. (Atlantic Highlands, N. J.: Humanities Press, 1952); Gerald Holton, "<!g>Einstein, Michelson, and the "Crucial" Experiment," in Thematic Origins of Scientific Theough: <!g>Kepler to Einstein (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1973/1980), esp. I, II, III/13.