<!g>John Polkinghorne, One World: The Interaction of Science and Theology (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1986), 22-24; John C. Polkinghorne, "<!g>The Quantum World," in Physics, Philosophy, and Theology: A Common Quest for Understanding, ed. <!g>Robert J. Russell, William R. Stoeger, S.J. and <!g>George V. Coyne, S.J. (Vatican City State: Vatican Observatory Publications, 1988), 43; Polkinghorne, The <!g>faith of a physicist, 25, 156. Note that Polkinghorne is apparently restricting the term ‘<!g>epistemology’ to the phenomena being observed and recorded (e.g., data and experience) whereas epistemology normally includes, and is even primarily focused on, the existing theories which account for phenomena (e.g., <!g>deterministic chaos, <!g>quantum physics, Freudian psychology). Thus to a critical realist the phrase "epistemology models <!g>ontology" would seem more likely to mean that the theories in science, perhaps even their specific concepts and terms, refer to reality regardless of what the phenomena might suggest.