View by:  Subject  Theme  Question  Term  Person  Event

The Caricature - Darwin v. Christianity

As with the Galileo Affair the tensions that intensified between scientists and theologians at this time have been much misunderstood. In the case of Darwin’s evolutionary scheme the caricature runs as follows:

  • that the Christian theologians of the time were all committed to a model in which God had designed every single creature exactly as that creature was known to the naturalists of the 1850s.

  • that Darwin’s book showed any belief in creation to be untenable, and

  • that the Bishop of Oxford, Samuel Wilberforce, rendered himself ridiculous by opposing Darwinism at the British Association Meeting in 1860.

The story goes that Wilberforce, recognising that Darwin’s scheme implied that humans too had evolved, from other apes, questioned Darwin’s friend and champion T.H.Huxley as to whether he was descended from an ape on his father’s side or his mother’s. Huxley, supposedly, quipped back that:

If then...the question is put to me ‘would I rather have a miserable ape for a grandfather or a man highly endowed by nature and possessed of great means and influence, and yet who employs those faculties and that influence for the mere purpose of introducing ridicule into a grave scientific discussion’ - I unhesitatingly affirm my preference for the ape.Quoted in Drees, 1996, 65

The evidence now suggests that the legend of these exchanges grew to its final form long after the event itself. Both John Brooke and Willem B Drees record a much more balanced view.Brooke, 1991, 40-42, Drees, 1996, 64-67

What the caricature ignores is that:

  1. Wilberforce was Vice-President of the Association that year, and made his critique of Darwinism as a scientist rather than a theologian.Brooke notes that between 1831-65 forty-one Anglican clergy held office in the B.A.; between 1866-1900 only three (Brooke, 1991, 50). So it is true that the 1860 Meeting came at a transitional time, but...He had reviewed The Origin of Species - adversely, but in a way which Darwin acknowledged as perceptive.Brooke, 1991, 42

  2. There were real scientific problems with Darwin’s evolutionary scheme, which were not lost on Bishop Wilberforce, a follower of Richard Owen’s theory of archetypal patterns in vertebrates (see important evolutionists before Darwin).

  3. Christian responses to Darwin varied greatly - some like Charles Kingsley were immediately affirmative (see early conflicts over Darwinism).

There were, then, just as in Galileo’s case, scientists and theologians on both sides of the question. Personalities, such as that of Huxley (‘Darwin’s bulldog’), exacerbated conflict. And just as Galileo pressed the issue by asserting himself as a natural philosopher, claiming truth rather than mere effectiveness of calculation (see the career of Galileo Galilei) so the new breed of 19th-Century scientists used the Darwinian controversy to press their authority over their discipline in a way which took the clerical establishment by surprise. What needs to be stressed is the complexity of the interaction between science and religion, and the shallowness of the caricature. The disputes over Darwinism did much to fuel the ‘conflict’ or ‘warfare’ hypothesis. But see Darwin’s challenge to theological positions to understand the actual core of the argument.

Email link | Feedback | Contributed by: Dr. Christopher Southgate
Source: God, Humanity and the Cosmos  (T&T Clark, 1999)

Topic Sets Available

AAAS Report on Stem-Cells

AstroTheology: Religious Reflections on Extraterrestrial Life Forms

Agency: Human, Robotic and Divine
Becoming Human: Brain, Mind, Emergence
Big Bang Cosmology and Theology (GHC)
Cosmic Questions Interviews

Cosmos and Creator
Creativity, Spirituality and Computing Technologies
CTNS Content Home
Darwin: A Friend to Religion?
Demystifying Information Technology
Divine Action (GHC)
Dreams and Dreaming: Neuroscientific and Religious Visions'
E. Coli at the No Free Lunchroom
Engaging Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence: An Adventure in Astro-Ethics
Evangelical Atheism: a response to Richard Dawkins
Ecology and Christian Theology
Evolution: What Should We Teach Our Children in Our Schools?
Evolution and Providence
Evolution and Creation Survey
Evolution and Theology (GHC)
Evolution, Creation, and Semiotics

The Expelled Controversy
Faith and Reason: An Introduction
Faith in the Future: Religion, Aging, and Healthcare in the 21st Century

Francisco Ayala on Evolution

From Christian Passions to Scientific Emotions
Genetic Engineering and Food

Genetics and Ethics
Genetic Technologies - the Radical Revision of Human Existence and the Natural World

Genomics, Nanotechnology and Robotics
Getting Mind out of Meat
God and Creation: Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Perspectives on Big Bang Cosmology
God, Humanity and the Cosmos: A Textbook in Science and Religion
God the Spirit - and Natural Science
Historical Examples of the Science and Religion Debate (GHC)
History of Creationism
Intelligent Design Coming Clean

Issues for the Millennium: Cloning and Genetic Technologies
Jean Vanier of L'Arche
Nano-Technology and Nano-ethics
Natural Science and Christian Theology - A Select Bibliography
Neuroscience and the Soul
Outlines of the Science and Religion Debate (GHC)

Perspectives on Evolution

Physics and Theology
Quantum Mechanics and Theology (GHC)
Questions that Shape Our Future
Reductionism (GHC)
Reintroducing Teleology Into Science
Science and Suffering

Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action (CTNS/Vatican Series)

Space Exploration and Positive Stewardship

Stem-Cell Debate: Ethical Questions
Stem-Cell Ethics: A Theological Brief

Stem-Cell Questions
Theistic Evolution: A Christian Alternative to Atheism, Creationism, and Intelligent Design...
Theology and Science: Current Issues and Future Directions
Unscientific America: How science illiteracy threatens our future
Will ET End Religion?

Current Stats: topics: >2600, links: >300,000, video: 200 hours.