View by:  Subject  Theme  Question  Term  Person  Event

Happel, Stephen. “Metaphors and Time Asymmetry: Cosmologies in Physics and Christian Meanings."

For Stephen Happel, the methodological bridge between theology and science comes through language - in particular, through metaphor. Happel argues that scientists, as well as theologians, use ordinary speech, constructed of metaphors, to originate, process and communicate their insights. By studying how scientists employ metaphors, theologians can discover an important role for cosmology in religious discourse. Similarly scientists can gain from understanding the hermeneutical framework they employ in their discourse.

Happel begins by studying the general reasons for focusing on metaphor in both fields, namely the conviction that science, like theology, is a hermeneutical venture. Next he focuses on the metaphors that adorn cosmology and the ways they narrate the story of the universe. Happel then argues that there is a basic relationship between the particular metaphors chosen by cosmologists and the actual temporal asymmetry of the universe. To support his claim, Happel critically evaluates four competing theories about the nature of metaphor. In the process he argues that in both science and religion metaphors communicate more than feelings: they indicate a state of affairs. Because of this, Happel is critical of Paul Ricoeur’s paradoxical “is/is not” view of metaphor and of theologians who appropriate it, preferring instead the moderate realism advanced by Mary Hesse and Bernard Lonergan.

Next Happel attempts to understand why some scientists hold an atemporal perspective on cosmology while others see the universe in terms of a temporal narrative such as the Big Bang. The difference is due less to physics or mathematics, Happel argues, than to the presuppositions one holds about metaphor. Atemporalists tend to have a Ricouerian view of metaphor as paradoxical, whereas temporalists tend toward a moderately realist theory of metaphor. Lonergan’s theory and its relation to emergent probability as the explanation of temporality provide just the needed ontological reference for the metaphors of time asymmetry.

Happel acknowledges that deconstructionists, drawing heavily on the writings of Jacques Derrida, propose an alternate theory in which the surplus of metaphors is sheer play without directionality or finality. He contrasts the teleological approach of scientists like John Barrow and Paul Davies, who treat cosmological metaphors as narrative, with the non-teleological approach of Stephen Hawking, who seems closer to Derrida and Ricoeur. Happel sees these approaches as parallel to the theological typologies of prophecy (narratives which stress the ethical imperative) and mystical communion (non-narrative descriptions of the atemporal identity with the divine). Both narrative and non-narrative languages are integrally intertwined in the doctrine of the Trinity. As a result, theologians might investigate how narrative and non-narrative interpretations of spacetime might be “equiprimordial, requiring a co-implicating dialectic.” Scientists, in turn, are encouraged to develop an approach which overcomes the symmetrical-asymmetrical arguments concerning temporality. Ultimately, whether the universe is seen in mystical or prophetic terms, God’s involvement is to be trusted, and God’s gift of time leads us to combine narrative and non-narrative language.

Email link | Printer-friendly | Feedback | Contributed by: CTNS/Vatican Observatory

Topic Sets Available

AAAS Report on Stem-Cells

AstroTheology: Religious Reflections on Extraterrestrial Life Forms

Agency: Human, Robotic and Divine
Becoming Human: Brain, Mind, Emergence
Big Bang Cosmology and Theology (GHC)
Cosmic Questions Interviews

Cosmos and Creator
Creativity, Spirituality and Computing Technologies
CTNS Content Home
Darwin: A Friend to Religion?
Demystifying Information Technology
Divine Action (GHC)
Dreams and Dreaming: Neuroscientific and Religious Visions'
E. Coli at the No Free Lunchroom
Engaging Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence: An Adventure in Astro-Ethics
Evangelical Atheism: a response to Richard Dawkins
Ecology and Christian Theology
Evolution: What Should We Teach Our Children in Our Schools?
Evolution and Providence
Evolution and Creation Survey
Evolution and Theology (GHC)
Evolution, Creation, and Semiotics

The Expelled Controversy
Faith and Reason: An Introduction
Faith in the Future: Religion, Aging, and Healthcare in the 21st Century

Francisco Ayala on Evolution

From Christian Passions to Scientific Emotions
Genetic Engineering and Food

Genetics and Ethics
Genetic Technologies - the Radical Revision of Human Existence and the Natural World

Genomics, Nanotechnology and Robotics
Getting Mind out of Meat
God and Creation: Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Perspectives on Big Bang Cosmology
God, Humanity and the Cosmos: A Textbook in Science and Religion
God the Spirit - and Natural Science
Historical Examples of the Science and Religion Debate (GHC)
History of Creationism
Intelligent Design Coming Clean

Issues for the Millennium: Cloning and Genetic Technologies
Jean Vanier of L'Arche
Nano-Technology and Nano-ethics
Natural Science and Christian Theology - A Select Bibliography
Neuroscience and the Soul
Outlines of the Science and Religion Debate (GHC)

Perspectives on Evolution

Physics and Theology
Quantum Mechanics and Theology (GHC)
Questions that Shape Our Future
Reductionism (GHC)
Reintroducing Teleology Into Science
Science and Suffering

Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action (CTNS/Vatican Series)

Space Exploration and Positive Stewardship

Stem-Cell Debate: Ethical Questions
Stem-Cell Ethics: A Theological Brief

Stem-Cell Questions
Theistic Evolution: A Christian Alternative to Atheism, Creationism, and Intelligent Design...
Theology and Science: Current Issues and Future Directions
Unscientific America: How science illiteracy threatens our future
Will ET End Religion?

Current Stats: topics: >2600, links: >300,000, video: 200 hours.