For subtle discussions of a spectrum of positions on the adequacy of science to account for nature, the possibility of wider perspectives, and the historical judgments made on these questions, see for example Francisco J. Ayala, "Darwin's Devolution: Design Without Designer," in Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. Robert John Russell, William R. Stoeger and Francisco J. Ayala (Vatican City State; Berkeley, Calif.: Vatican Observatory Publications; Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 1998); Wesley J. Wildman, "Evaluating the Teleological Argument for Divine Action," in Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. Robert John Russell, William R. Stoeger and Francisco J. Ayala (Vatican City State; Berkeley, Calif.: Vatican Observatory Publications; Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 1998); Charles Birch, "Neo-Darwinism, Self-Organization, and Divine Action in Evolution," in Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. Robert John Russell, William R. Stoeger and Francisco J. Ayala (Vatican City State; Berkeley, Calif.: Vatican Observatory Publications; Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 1998); Ian G. Barbour, "Five Models of God and Evolution," in Evolutionary and Molecular Biology: Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action, ed. Robert John Russell, William R. Stoeger and Francisco J. Ayala (Vatican City State; Berkeley, Calif.: Vatican Observatory Publications; Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences, 1998); Edwin A. Burtt, The Metaphysical Foundations of Modern Physical Science; a Historical and Critical Essay, Rev. ed. (Atlantic Highlands, N. J.: Humanities Press, 1952); Gerald Holton, "Einstein, Michelson, and the "Crucial" Experiment," in Thematic Origins of Scientific Theough: Kepler to Einstein (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1973/1980), esp. I, II, III/13.