View by:  Subject  Theme  Question  Term  Person  Event

The requested page was not found.

Topic Sets Available

AAAS Report on Stem-Cells

AstroTheology: Religious Reflections on Extraterrestrial Life Forms

Agency: Human, Robotic and Divine
Becoming Human: Brain, Mind, Emergence
Big Bang Cosmology and Theology (GHC)
Cosmic Questions Interviews

Cosmos and Creator
Creativity, Spirituality and Computing Technologies
CTNS Content Home
Darwin: A Friend to Religion?
Demystifying Information Technology
Divine Action (GHC)
Dreams and Dreaming: Neuroscientific and Religious Visions'
E. Coli at the No Free Lunchroom
Engaging Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence: An Adventure in Astro-Ethics
Evangelical Atheism: a response to Richard Dawkins
Ecology and Christian Theology
Evolution: What Should We Teach Our Children in Our Schools?
Evolution and Providence
Evolution and Creation Survey
Evolution and Theology (GHC)
Evolution, Creation, and Semiotics

The Expelled Controversy
Faith and Reason: An Introduction
Faith in the Future: Religion, Aging, and Healthcare in the 21st Century

Francisco Ayala on Evolution

From Christian Passions to Scientific Emotions
Genetic Engineering and Food

Genetics and Ethics
Genetic Technologies - the Radical Revision of Human Existence and the Natural World

Genomics, Nanotechnology and Robotics
Getting Mind out of Meat
God and Creation: Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Perspectives on Big Bang Cosmology
God, Humanity and the Cosmos: A Textbook in Science and Religion
God the Spirit - and Natural Science
Historical Examples of the Science and Religion Debate (GHC)
History of Creationism
Intelligent Design Coming Clean

Issues for the Millennium: Cloning and Genetic Technologies
Jean Vanier of L'Arche
Nano-Technology and Nano-ethics
Natural Science and Christian Theology - A Select Bibliography
Neuroscience and the Soul
Outlines of the Science and Religion Debate (GHC)

Perspectives on Evolution

Physics and Theology
Quantum Mechanics and Theology (GHC)
Questions that Shape Our Future
Reductionism (GHC)
Reintroducing Teleology Into Science
Science and Suffering

Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action (CTNS/Vatican Series)

Space Exploration and Positive Stewardship

Stem-Cell Debate: Ethical Questions
Stem-Cell Ethics: A Theological Brief

Stem-Cell Questions
Theistic Evolution: A Christian Alternative to Atheism, Creationism, and Intelligent Design...
Theology and Science: Current Issues and Future Directions
Unscientific America: How science illiteracy threatens our future
Will ET End Religion?

Current Stats: topics: >2600, links: >300,000, video: 200 hours.

Fine Tuning

Recently, many physicists and cosmologists have argued that there is quite a problem in how our cosmic environment manages to be one in which Darwinian evolution can operate over long ages to produce living beings. The cosmic period known to us began with a Big Bang. It looks as if the early cosmic density, and the associated expansion speed, needed tuning with immense accuracy for there to be gas clouds able to condense into stars: tuning to perhaps one part in a trillion trillion trillion trillion trillion. Further, the strength of the nuclear weak force had to fall inside narrow limits for the Big Bang to generate any hydrogen (which was needed for making water and for long-lived, stable stars like the sun) and for the creation of all elements heavier than helium. Also the strength ratio between electromagnetism and gravity needed extremely accurate tuning, perhaps to one part in many trillion trillion, for there to be sun-like stars. Again, the existence of chemistry seemingly demanded very precise adjustment of the masses of the neutron, the proton and the electron.

In a book of mine, Universes (1989), I made a long list of such claims about fine tuning. No doubt some of the claims will turn out to be wrong. For instance, it might be that the early cosmic expansion speed was more or less forced to be what it was, because of a process known as “inflation”, and the people who think that inflation itself needed very precise tuning could be mistaken. What is impressive, I suggest, is not any particular one of the claims about fine tuning, but the large number of claims which seem plausible, and the consequent implausibility of thinking that every single claim is erroneous. Here, then, we might be thought to have evidence of design, provided we judged that such design would have been directed towards producing living beings in a non-miraculous fashion through making the world obey physical laws which led to the existence of stable stars, planets, and an environment with a rich chemistry in which life could evolve.

Contributed by: Dr. John Leslie

Cosmic Questions

Was the Universe Designed? Topic Index
The Meaning of Design

Fine Tuning

Introduction
The Argument from Design
Design and Living Beings
Design and Divine Conservation
Fine Tuning and the Laws of Nature
Anthropic Principles
The Best of All Universes
Design and Human Survival
A Platonic Approach
Spinoza's Compromise

Source:


John Leslie

Related Media:

The Anthropic Principle
A Beginningless Universe?
Did the Universe Have a Beginning?
Was the Universe Designed?
Are we Alone?
Interview Index
Hubble Deep Field Animation
  Media Index

Other Resources:

Big Bang Cosmology and Theology
Books
Glossary Terms
Bonus Material Home...