View by:  Subject  Theme  Question  Term  Person  Event

The requested page was not found.

Topic Sets Available

AAAS Report on Stem-Cells

AstroTheology: Religious Reflections on Extraterrestrial Life Forms

Agency: Human, Robotic and Divine
Becoming Human: Brain, Mind, Emergence
Big Bang Cosmology and Theology (GHC)
Cosmic Questions Interviews

Cosmos and Creator
Creativity, Spirituality and Computing Technologies
CTNS Content Home
Darwin: A Friend to Religion?
Demystifying Information Technology
Divine Action (GHC)
Dreams and Dreaming: Neuroscientific and Religious Visions'
E. Coli at the No Free Lunchroom
Engaging Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence: An Adventure in Astro-Ethics
Evangelical Atheism: a response to Richard Dawkins
Ecology and Christian Theology
Evolution: What Should We Teach Our Children in Our Schools?
Evolution and Providence
Evolution and Creation Survey
Evolution and Theology (GHC)
Evolution, Creation, and Semiotics

The Expelled Controversy
Faith and Reason: An Introduction
Faith in the Future: Religion, Aging, and Healthcare in the 21st Century

Francisco Ayala on Evolution

From Christian Passions to Scientific Emotions
Genetic Engineering and Food

Genetics and Ethics
Genetic Technologies - the Radical Revision of Human Existence and the Natural World

Genomics, Nanotechnology and Robotics
Getting Mind out of Meat
God and Creation: Jewish, Christian, and Muslim Perspectives on Big Bang Cosmology
God, Humanity and the Cosmos: A Textbook in Science and Religion
God the Spirit - and Natural Science
Historical Examples of the Science and Religion Debate (GHC)
History of Creationism
Intelligent Design Coming Clean

Issues for the Millennium: Cloning and Genetic Technologies
Jean Vanier of L'Arche
Nano-Technology and Nano-ethics
Natural Science and Christian Theology - A Select Bibliography
Neuroscience and the Soul
Outlines of the Science and Religion Debate (GHC)

Perspectives on Evolution

Physics and Theology
Quantum Mechanics and Theology (GHC)
Questions that Shape Our Future
Reductionism (GHC)
Reintroducing Teleology Into Science
Science and Suffering

Scientific Perspectives on Divine Action (CTNS/Vatican Series)

Space Exploration and Positive Stewardship

Stem-Cell Debate: Ethical Questions
Stem-Cell Ethics: A Theological Brief

Stem-Cell Questions
Theistic Evolution: A Christian Alternative to Atheism, Creationism, and Intelligent Design...
Theology and Science: Current Issues and Future Directions
Unscientific America: How science illiteracy threatens our future
Will ET End Religion?

Current Stats: topics: >2600, links: >300,000, video: 200 hours.

Empty Space in our Solar System

There is a lot of empty space in our solar system. In a scale model where the sun is represented by a weather balloon 1 meter in diameter sitting in the Baird Auditorium of the Smithsonian's Museum of Natural History, Jupiter would be a grapefruit orbiting at a distance of 500 meters, as far away as the Federal Triangle Metro stop. The earth would be the size of a beer nut, orbiting well outside the museum, say at the distance of Constitution Avenue (see Table 1 for more details).

Object

Period

Scale
Mass

Model Diameter

Orbital Size

Sun

 

1000

1 m

 

Mercury

88 d

0.0002

3 mm

40 m

Venus

224 d

0.0026

8 mm

70 m

Earth

365 d

0.0032

8 mm

100 m

Mars

687 d

0.0003

4 mm

150 m

Jupiter

12 yr

1

10 cm

500 m

Saturn

29 yr

0.30

9 cm

1 km

Uranus

84 yr

0.046

3 cm

2 km

Neptune

165 yr

0.054

3 cm

3 km

Pluto

249 yr

0.0005

2 mm

4 km

Table 1. Our Solar System

In contrast to our own solar system, the first extrasolar planets were found in tight, short-period orbits. For example, 51 Pegasi was found to have a companion similar in mass to Jupiter,Mayor, M. & Queloz, D. 1995, Nature, 378, 355but orbiting with a period of only 4 days. In our scale model, that planet would be represented by a grapefruit with an orbit about the same size as the stage of the Baird Auditorium. In retrospect it should not have been a surprise that massive planets in short-period orbits were the first to be discovered, because they are the easiest to detect with the Doppler technique being used. This is an indirect technique. We do not see the light reflected (or heat emitted) by the planet itself, but instead we detect the reflex motion that the gravitational pull of the planet induces in its parent star. Just as the planet sweeps around in its orbit, so the parent star must respond with a counterbalancing motion. Of course, the amplitude of the star's motion is much smaller and harder to detect, by the ratio of the masses. Jupiter orbits at 12 kilometers per second, but the sun's raction is 12 meters per second, not much faster than a sprinter can run. But, if you move Jupiter in 100 times closer, the orbital velocity must go up by a factor of 10. If you make the planet 10 times more massive than Jupiter, this also makes the Doppler signature go up by a factor of 10.

Therefore, the first planetary companions discovered by the Doppler technique were in very tight orbits and/or were considerably more massive than Jupiter. This is illustrated in Figure 3, where I have plotted the 20 planets discovered so far using the Doppler technique, together with Jupiter and Saturn. The vertical axis is the semi-major axis of the planet's orbit (a measure of the size of the orbit) in Astronomical Units (AU, the distance of the earth from the sun). At 5.2 and 9.5 AU, Jupiter and Saturn (plotted as filled circles near the top of the figure) have considerably larger orbits than any of the extrasolar planets. The planets at the bottom of the diagram have such small orbits that the periods are as short as 3 or 4 days, and the shapes of the orbits have been circularized by tidal forces.

The horizontal axis in Figure 3 is the mass the planetary companion would have if the orbit happens to be oriented so that we view it edge-on. The actual inclination of the orbit to the line of sight, i, can not be determined from Doppler measurements alone, and thus is usually unknown. If the orbit is actually tilted up to the line of sight, then our estimate of the mass of the planet is too small by the factor 1/sin(i).

Figure 3

In Figure 3 I have only plotted the planet candidates with minimum masses less than 10 Jupiter masses (MJ). There are also a few companions with minimum masses in the range between 10 MJ and the substellar limit at about 75 MJ, but they seem to be relatively rare. It is almost as if the process that makes planets does not produce companions much bigger than 10 or 20 MJ, while the process that makes stars does not produce companions much smaller than 75 MJ.Mazeh, T., Goldberg, D., & Latham, D. W. 1998, ApJL, 51, L199

Contributed by: Dr. David Latham

Cosmic Questions

Are We Alone? Topic Index
Homes for Extraterrestrial Life: Extra-Solar Planets

Empty Space in our Solar System

Introduction
Jupiters not Earths
No True Jupiters Detected
Deciphering General Characteristics
Seeking Multiple Planetary Systems
A Rich Variety of Environments
Other Discovery Techniques

Source:


David Latham

Related Media:

Is there Intelligent Life Elsewhere in the Universe?
Did the Universe Have a Beginning?
Was the Universe Designed?
Are we Alone?
Interview Index
Hubble Deep Field Animation
  Media Index

Other Resources:

Big Bang Cosmology and Theology
Books
Glossary Terms
Bonus Material Home...