| Before describing the basics  
of our view of the universe circa 1999, it is interesting to reflect on how  
much our view of the universe has grown in the twentieth century. One-hundred years ago an astronomer would  
have probably described the universe as a flattened disk, thirty-thousand  
lightyears in diameter and six-thousand-five-hundred light-years thick, with our  
solar system located "at or very near" the center. This model universe, named the Kapteyn Universe after the Dutch astronomer Jacobus Cornelius Kapteyn  
(1851-1922), does not extend beyond our own Milky Way galaxy. In 1918, the American astronomer Harlow  
Shapley demonstrated that we do not live in the center of the Milky Way, and in  
1924 another American astronomer, <!g>Edwin Hubble, proved that just as our sun is  
just one of billions of stars in our home galaxy, the Milky Way was just one of  
billions of galaxies. After the second  
discovery of Hubble, we realized that the universe is of far greater  
proportions than imagined in 1899. Figure 1: The Kapteyn  
Universe Not only did Hubble extend  
our cosmic horizon to encompass billions and billions of galaxies beyond the  
Milky Way, but his 1929 discovery of the expansion of the universe was the  
first of two great cosmological discoveries of the twentieth century. The second great discovery was in 1964, when  
Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson discovered the existence of a cosmic background  
of radiation. We now understand that  
the cosmic background radiation, currently at a temperature of about three  
degrees Kelvin (3 K) above absolute zero (equivalent to -270oC or -454oF), is  
the remnant of the hot radiation from the early universe. The discovery of the expansion of the  
universe and the observation of the cosmic background radiation are the  
cornerstones of our modern model of the universe, the big-bang model. The body of evidence 
supporting the big-bang model is so overwhelming that it is impossible to escape 
the conclusion that the universe was once denser and hotter than it is 
today. We no longer question that the 
<!g>big bang is a good description of the universe for most of its history. The real question is how far back we can 
extrapolate the big bang. When (if 
ever) will the big-bang model fail? Can 
we trust the big-bang model under the extreme conditions near the time of the 
big bang? Let's journey through the 
complete history of the universe, running the film of the big bang backwards, 
pausing occasionally to examine the conditions we encounter. Contributed by: Dr. <!g>Edward Kolb |